Fig. 1—America’s much ballyhooed “special relationship” with Britain is, in fact, our worst nightmare. If you doubt, consider that Sir Nigel Knowles is the lead trustee for the Prince’s Trust International and Prince’s Trust America founded in Malta in 2015. He has been chairman of DLA Piper for decades and is considered its effective chairman-for-life considering his intimacy with Prince Charles. Knowles is also a director of SGO Smartmatic/Dominion with former Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations Lord Mark Malloch-Brown who is founder and chairman. Smartmatic / Dominion / Hart Intercivic / ES&S / Optech / Sequoia / Scytl / Paragon / Premier / Diebold are all the rigged voting systems at the epicenter of the fradulent 2020 U.S. election. Vice Pretender Kamala Harris newly-minted husband, Doug Emhoff, worked for Knowles at DLA Piper. These interlocking relationships are clear evidence of conspiracy among these parties. If you think this Prince’s Trust information is scandalous, read on.

Ever since the Rothschild-funded War of 1812 Britain has plotted through cunning, flattery and bribery to take back control of America.

Remember, N.M. Rothschild used his 1812 war profits to pay off all British slave-owners in 1838, which started Barclays, HSBC and offshore banking that funded the Y.M.C.A., and replaced sodomized and raped black and brown slaves with yellow and white ones.

When you hear “Rothschild,” also think British Pilgrims Society (which he co-founded), J.P. Morgan, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, Raget Abys,* James W. Maxwell** and Cornelius Vanderbilt***—all Rothschild slavery-dependent banking disciples.


When you hear about the “special relationship” between Britain and America, grab your Constitution and Bill of Rights and fight because you are being scammed. Any politician who says it, like Mike Pompeo, is either an ignoramous or in on the scam.

Chatham House (London)* and the Council on Foreign Relations (New York) were created post-WWI (ca. 1919) to orchestrate the British takeover of America using Rothschild et al funding


The cowards at Chatham House fronted their subtrafuge behind the Y.M.C.A.

On Jun. 30, 1925, the Y.M.C.A. founded the “Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR)” hiding behind a pseudo-Christian veneer, but its true purpose was satanic.

On Jul. 18, 1926, Pilgrim RCA/NBC David Sarnoff predicted that a deadly techno-virus would be used in future warfare.

Chatham House slyly drove the IPR agenda to: (1) replace the League of Nations with the United Nations, (2) empower Mao Tse-tung’s emerging Chinese Communist Party via their control of the Soviet Communist Party (yes), and (3) turn U.S. State Department policy full on communist

You may be thinking: “WAT? British? Communist? Britain is a democracy!

Wrong. That is the propaganda façade. The opposite is the truth, and has been for two centuries.

Sadly, Britain is an imperial corporatist fascist state intent on controlling the world in a renewed British Empire where: (1) the self-anointed elitists live as lords of the manor, and (2) everyone else is either killed (depopulated) or caged in communist matchboxes where “you’ll own nothing and be happy” (Klaus Schwab, the “Great Reset”).

Communism in all forms is a British creation to fulfill their macabre dream of world domination (Russia, China, Korea, Vietnam communism—all British directed to create endless opportunities for war and conflict to feed their bank and corporation profits)

This march of the British jack boots through history must be stopped before they wipe out all of humanity in their cowardly hubris, God’s intervention notwithstanding.

Our Prayer: +++ May the angel of death pass over you and yours in these perilous times. +++

(Aug. 06, 2021)—Newly-discovered 1925 YMCA China documents reveal British treachery on full display in America.

British Chatham House hid inside the Y.M.C.A. to: (1) form the United Nations (U.N.) in 1945, (2) propel Mao Tse-tung to power, and (3) make the U.S. State Department full on communist.

Here are some of our shocking findings:

  1. The British Royal Society of International Affairs at Chatham House was formed in London by the Pilgrims Society in about 1919, along with its sister, the Council on Foreign Relations in New York;
  2. On Jun. 06, 1925, Chatham House formed the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR) with Sir Ivison S. Macadam as head of the British IPR Council under the auspices of the Y.M.C.A. as an ostensible “Christian” endeavor;
  3. Macadam then became the first Secretary and Director-General of Chatham House, thus being able to steer both the Y.M.C.A. (and its Chinese expansion) and the IPR from London;
  4. Both the Y.M.C.A. China expansion and the IPR were funded by Rockefeller, Carnegie, J.P. Morgan (Rothschild), IBM, GE and AT&T;
  5. Chatham House coordinated with Mao Tse-tung to created Chinese communism through Lenin and Stalin in Moscow (also Pilgrims creations) as go-between’s;
  6. The IPR/Chatham House formed the United Nations in 1945;
  7. The IPR by then had effectively seized control of the U.S. State Department’s turn to communism inside the agency.

In short, the British created Chinese communism using Russian communists. In this way, Chatham House directed the entire “anti- and pro- communist” Cold War conflict for fun and profit, as well as for the takedown of America.

How did they do it?


The “special relationship” between Britain and America propaganda has been much ballyhooed all our lives.

The talisman felt warm and fuzzy, so no one asked what it was or why it was special. Turns out, it is demonic. The details of this so-called “special relationship” only started coming to light in simultaneous FOIA releases in Britain and American in 2010.

The phrase “special relationship” was first uttered by Winston Churchill on Mar. 05, 1946 with President Harry Truman at his side from the back of a train car in Fulton, Missouri during their victory laps for WWII—a war that they fabricated in the baths of the Y.M.C.A. under the banner of the “Institute of Pacific Relations.”

Fig. 2Winston Churchill. (Mar. 05, 1946). Special Relationship Anniversary 1946-2016. US Embassy, London.

What the U.S. and the world did not know for 64 years (until 2010 in NSA FOIA releases) was that on that very same day America had just relinquished sovereignty of its communications and intelligence apparatus to the British Empire in a “Top Secret Ultra” agreement now called “Five Eyes.”


Few Americans, not even presidents, were told about this agreement, it was beyond top secret and those with knowledge of it could not even admit that it existed.

Fig. 3TOP SECRET (Mar. 05, 1946). BRITISH-U.S. COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE AGREEMENT, NSA DocID 3678942, Ser. XILH, Box 47, TSC release approved Apr. 08, 2010, Executive Order 12958 et seq., p. 7, Sec. 5(a). NSA.


Truth is, British control of American communications started much earlier, reaching all the way back to Samuel Morris and telegraphy (ca. 1832).

The British never let go of their hegemony of global communications (and its antecedents of news and propaganda), because with it, their Rothschild bankers could use intelligence and propaganda to manipulate markets in perpetuity.

This communications-propaganda control created endless opportunities for the British to corner the market on war and profit. To a British eugenicist necromancer, depopulation is icing on the cake.

In fact, they learned they could lie their way into fake conflicts, then fund both “sides” of the real wars that they fabricated. Remember, real people died in these wars. Many more were maimed for life. Human creativity has been hijacked for the profits of insiders. This British penchant for perpetual conflict to control the world is truly satanic.


War-making and conflict is the ultimate profit-making business of the British government today, as well as their American and European sycophants.

Sadly, these evil specters have created our laws and written our histories for hundreds of years. We are all slaves to it, black, white, brown and yellow.

When Morse invented telegraphy (ca. 1832), the British stole it and created numerous cardboard cutouts to confuse the public. The Rothschild banks learned they could exploit it to manipulate markets by knowing or fabricating overseas news first.

When Tesla invented wireless telegraphy (ca. 1890), the British Privy Council stole it for their cardboard cutouts Guglielmo Marconi and RCA/NBC David Sarnoff.

When Farnsworth invented television (ca. 1927), RCA-NBC stole it and repeated the Morse claims confusion.

When McKibben invented social networking (ca. 2000), his attorney James P. Chandler III, the State Department, U.S. Patent Office (run by Sir Geoffry Pattie, British Marconi-SERCO), IBM and DARPA stole it, created the IBM Eclipse Foundation give away, and they created a multitude of cardboard cutouts at Facebook, Google, Instagram, Twitter, Netflix, Oracle, Apple, Qualcomm, YouTube, Yahoo!, etc.—all so Britain could control social networking worldwide.

We have investigated and written extensively on most aspects of this overview.

However, a missing piece was the inner workings of how the Pilgrims Society carried out their hegemony after WWI to now.


While investigating the meteoric rise of the British-created Y.M.C.A. from 1844 around the world, we looked into their astounding and well-financed growth of the Y.M.C.A. in China.

We found a nicely-illustrated and information-packed 30th YMCA China annual report that included a “Constructive Activities” supplement dated Dec. 01, 1925.

Fig. 4—Constructive Activities of the Young Men’s Christian Associations of China, 1925. (Dec. 01, 1925). Annual and Quarterly Reports of the YMCAs of China, Korea, and Hong Kong, 1902-1904, Box 18, Folder 4, PDF p. 14. Univ. of Minnesota, Kautz Family YMCA Archives.

However, the document contents read suspiciously like geopolitical propaganda, not like a Christian non-profit report.

From its founding in 1895, YMCA China had grown with major donations from the Rockefeller Foundation, Carnegie Foundation and J.P. Morgan, among many, to 44,550 members, 42 cities, 201 YMCA facilities, 480 paid teachers, 3+ million program participants, $1 million income ($15.5 million today) and $3.3 million in property value ($51.2 million today).

Fig. 5—Constructive Activities of the Young Men’s Christian Associations of China, 1925. (Dec. 01, 1925). Annual and Quarterly Reports of the YMCAs of China, Korea, and Hong Kong, 1902-1904, Box 18, Folder 4, PDF p. 2. Univ. of Minnesota, Kautz Family YMCA Archives.

Stop and think. This is unnatural growth for a non-profit. Those funds did not come from workout and swimming fees.

The document was hyping a literacy campaign named the Mass Education Movement. A young Mao Tse-tung was one of its organizers. The other remarkable thing about this document was the name dropping.

Y.M.C.A. compared to Joshua leading the Israelites! They highlighted Dr. Sun Yat-sen, the first president of the Republic of China (1912) who overthrew the Qing dynasty. He called upon the YMCA to be a Joshua to lead China!

They also highlighted U.S. president Calvin Coolidge who called out the Y.M.C.A. as a labor feeder of young men for the “multitudes of great industrial establishments” and “service to the industrial class.”

They also highlighted Wu Ting Fang, a British-educated attorney, former Qing minister to the United States, then minister of foreign affairs and acting premier of the PRC.

They carried a bizarre quote by T.Z. Koo, national director of YMCA China, and later adviser to the Chinese delegation to the San Francisco at the founding of the United Nations in Apr. 1945.

In a superb piece of anti-Christian propaganda that served to divorce the Y.M.C.A. movement from Christian churches, he said:

“It understands [the Far Eastern mind] and might accept the Christianity of Christ, but it denies that the Christianity of Christ is the Christianity of Christendom.”

Perhaps the best triple-speak in history?

Then, Koo does a masterful job of offering the Y.M.C.A.’s unique flavor of Christianity to fill the gap and do the job in China that the Church and Christians have not.

Later documents, a few conferences hence, discard any notion that the IPR has Christian aims. It all became British Chatham House geopolitical.

“Into this situation the National Y.M.C.A. movement is injecting new life and leadership in the form of men capable of leading the thoughts of the students of China and its undertaking during these few years to meet this special emergency by emphasizing more than ever before the work in the student associations, not to impress upon the students their importance as individuals so as to lead them to undertake responsibilities beyond their powers, but to help them by guidance into serious discussion on international affairs, Christianity, science and religion, and to impart to them a larger faith in order that the proper view point [sic] might be attained together with vision and the requisite preparation for life.”

In other words, in a masterful bit of word soup propaganda, Koo called upon China’s emerging revolutionaries to abandon their churches and follow the Y.M.C.A.’s new brand of Christianity, and heed the indoctrination, including the new Mass Education Movement (Leninist-Stalinist communist indoctrination and organizing).

Yoo’s criticisms of Western Christianity must be kept in the larger context emerging from this research.

The British Pilgrims Society, with heavy Rothschild-Carnegie-Rockefeller financing, financed the “God is dead” movement, along with liberation theology. They also fabricated the “social gospel” commun-ist strategy of the Salvation Army in 1890.

Yoo was propagandizing against a bastardized Christianity created by his very Western Pilgrims Society British handlers!

True Christians to this day have little idea about the nuts and bolts of the convolutions of the long game these devils are playing to destroy Christ’s message of love.


Now the punch line of this article. The report then describes that from Jun. 30 to Jul. 14, 1925, the Y.M.C.A. founded “The Institute of Pacific Relations” (IPR).

Fig. 6—Ray Lyman Wilbur, chairman. (Jun. 30-Jul. 14, 1925). Organizing Conference Record, PROCEEDINGS, Institute of Pacific Relations, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 1-2. Institute of Pacific Relations. Reproduced for educational purposes only. Fair Use relied upon.

Note: In this first meeting, Chatham House was fronted by Commonwealth participants from Canada, New Zealand and Australia, as well as “at-large” participants from Switzerland.

By the Fourth Biennial Conference in Hangchow, China, Oct. 21-Nov. 04, 1931, Chatham House was fully disclosed as the British IPR Council, including the director of Chatham House, Sir Ivison S. Macadam. The “British Group” was identified in the 4th report as having been present at the Second Conference in Honolulu (p.12).

Click here to read the full 240-page Summary of the PROCEEDINGS of the Jun. 30-Jul. 14, 1925 First Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR) Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.

None of our researchers and consultants had ever heard of this group. For grins, we looked at what Wikipedia’s propaganda had to say. They totally obscure the YMCA’s founding role.

That’s like red meat to a dog for AFI researchers!

Every globalist information site jumped through hoops to downplay the Y.M.C.A.’s role. Some just ignored it.

Here is the new history that is jumping off the pages of our research (following).

The facts are unmistakable that Mao Tse-tung was taking British orders delivered through Lenin and Stalin in Moscow.

Permit us to bottom line facts about the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR):

  1. The IPR founded in 1925 at a Y.M.C.A. conference in Honolulu. Had been in the planning since 1920, about the same time as the founding of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (London) and the Council on Foreign Relations (New York).
  2. Funded by Rockefeller, Carnegie, J.P. Morgan (Rothschild, Thomas W. Lamont), IBM, GE (RCA, NBC), the usual globalist suspects.
  3. Organized into national IPR councils for United States, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, France, China, India, Philippines, Pakistan, Japan and Russia.
  4. The British Council was led by (Sir) Ivison S. Macadam, KCVO, Kt, CBE, CStJ, FRSE, FKC; subsequently the first Secretary and Director-General of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) and a Knight of Malta.
    IPR British Council, Sir Ivison S. Macadam Fig. 7.
  5. Chatham House is famous for its Rule that protects its members from liability for illegal activities by no note taking or meeting records.
  6. The YMCA called its British Council “Chatham House” and Royal Institute of International Affairs interchangeably.
  7. The Pilgrim and “settlement movement” (“social gospel”) promoter for Salvation Army and Y.M.C.A.MP Philip Whitwell Wilson, became handler for Vladimir Lenin.

    Whitwell Wilson also promoted the Chinese communist YMCA and the Mass Education Movement (disguised as Chinese character simplification) for the IPR. Mao Tse-tung came to power through the movement. Whitwell Wilson was also a Pilgrims organizer of the First Imperial Press Conference, 1909.

    Through the Y.M.C.A. / IPR Mass Education Movement, Mao Tse-tung and the communists were brought to power in China. The much maligned Sen. Joseph McCarthy was indeed right: “Today we are engaged in a final, all-out battle between communistic atheism and Christianity.” He had identified the IPR in his investigations.

Fig. 8Ray Lyman Wilbur, chairman. (Jun. 30-Jul. 14, 1925). Organizing Conference Record, PROCEEDINGS, Institute of Pacific Relations, Honolulu, Hawaii, p. 40. Institute of Pacific Relations. Reproduced for educational purposes only. Fair Use relied upon.
Fig. 9Thomas H. Hardman, ed. pub. (Jun. 05-26, 1909). A PARLIAMENT OF THE PRESS – THE FIRST IMPERIAL PRESS CONFERENCE, 1909, Illustrated, with Preface by The Earl of Rosebery, K.G. London: Horace Marshall & Son

Note that Sir Gilbert Parker was Director of American Propaganda, British War Propaganda Bureau, Wellington House in WWI (1914-1916).

  • 8. The IPR International Conference in 1945 was the “trial balloon” for the United Nations founding conference on Apr. 25, 1945. In other words, the IPR created the United Nations under the control of British (Pilgrims Society) Chatham House.
  • 9. By 1950, many in the U.S. Congress considered the IPR a front for world communism.

Y.M.C.A. / Chatham House / U.N. Institute of Pacific Relations—an evident communist front organization used [in reality] to press communist policies at the State Department, support Russian Bolshevism and bring Mao to power in China [while being anti-Communist in propaganda]

Fig. 10—S. Res. 366, Rept. No. 2050. (Jun. 27, 1952). Institute of Pacific Relations, Report, Patrick A. McCarran (NV), chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, Hrgs. Jul. 25, 1951-Jun. 20, 1952, 81st Cong., 2d sess., GPO.

10. Pilgrims Society member Dean Acheson was a central figure in the IPR-YMCA as well as the United Nations and the Marshall Plan. He was Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations and International Conferences (1944-45), Under Secretary of State (1945-47),  Secretary of State (1949-53).

11. Among Congress’ 32 Conclusions about IPR, not counting the criminal indictment recommendations against IPR leaders were these:

  • A chief function of the IPR has been to influence United States public opinion.
  • Numerous “scholarly” IPR articles and books “knowingly and deliberately” wrote and edited in an attempt to influence American public opinion with pro-Communist content.
  • Owen Lattimore and John Carter Vincent, American experts on China, were toasted by Soviet leaders: “Owen Lattimore and John Carter Vincent, American experts on China, on whom rests great responsibility for China’s future.
  • The Institute of Pacific Relations has not maintained the character of an objective, scholarly, and research organization.
  • A group of persons operating within and about the Institute of Pacific Relations exerted a substantial influence on United States far eastern policy.
  • Official connections were in operations between the IPR and the Communist International.
  • Over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of IPR pressure and influence in the State Department.
  • The IPR possessed close organic relations with the State Department through interchange of personnel, attendance of State Department officials at IPR conferences, con stand exchange of information and social contacts.
  • The effective leadership of the IPR used IPR prestige to promote the interest of the Soviet Union (including making China communist) in the United States.
  • Owen Lattimore and John Carter Vincent were influential in bringing about a change in United States policy in 1945 favorable to the Chinese Communists.
  • During the period 1945-49, persons associated with the Institute of Pacific Relations were instrumental in keeping United States policy on a course favorable to Communist objectives in China

Owen Lattimore [IPR director; Editor of Pacific Relations; Roosevelt’s Office of War Information (1944); advisor to V.P. Wallace’s mission to Siberia, China and Mongolia 1944); chief organizer of the first United Nations San Francisco Conference (1945)].

John Carter Vincent (Far Eastern Section of the State Department; IPR Trustee (1945); “influential in bringing about a change in United States policy in 1945 favorable to the Chinese Communists.


The China! China! China! and Russia! Russia! Russia! rhetoric now has context.

They are both British kabuki theater to keep us from fixing the real problem, which is defunding all British interests in America immediately, starting with SERCO, QinetiQ, Crown Agents, Senior Executive Service, Vanguard, Fidelity, Blackrock, DLA Piper, PriceWaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young. These corruptocrats could not accomplish this hegemony without help from “attorney/auditors” to keep their two sets of books, so we must start shining a light on them, demanding they be disbarred, discredited, and prosecuted for their lies and misrepresentations to the public.


We conclude that WWII was a British scam to unify Russia and China as fake communist enemies against the Western world in order to fuel both sides of the “Iron Curtain” Pilgrims Society media propaganda conflict (Churchill introduced this term at the same “special relationship” speech on Mar. 06, 1946.)

Who among us did not believe the anti-communist spin? Think of it. On the one hand our government was making noise for anti-communist policies around the planet while our State Department was fueling that enemy to be a better enemy—the fake “clash of nations.” It is hard for us as patriotic Americans to write this because it is obnoxious at a very basic level.

The evidence is also unmistakable that the British Pilgrims Society coached Vladimir Lenin (before 1902) on the execution of Bolshevism in Russia. His coach was Pilgrims co-founder and settlement movement proponent MP Philip Whitwell Wilson. Wilson was also a Y.M.C.A. advocate; editor of the London Daily News; co-founder of the First Imperial Press Conference, 1909; co-founder of the Empire Press Union; co-founder of MI-6, MI-5 and GC&CS now GCHQ and later New York Times.

Before Lenin, the Pilgrims were coaching The Salvation Army on how to minimize their Christian salvation message into the “social gospel” of their settlement movement. The settlement movement emanated from the pen of homosexual philosopher John Ruskin to whom many founding Pilgrims were devoted. At the same time, these same people were following the necromancy, pedophilia and journalistic fantasies of Pilgrims co-founder W.T. Stead and his staff. The Salvation Army had moved its operations into many countries also populated by the YMCA.

We now know that a favorite propaganda tactic of the Pilgrims is to fabricate and fund an enemy in the media where you then also finance their opponent. This maximizes profit taking and rids the world of more “useless eaters,” their inhuman term for you and me.

We know from the IPR record that secret meetings were held in Moscow where participation was limited to the British (Chatham House), American and Chinese Councils.

We believe we are uncovering that the British Pilgrims, through Chatham House with a cc. to the CFR, deployed the IPR as a go-between whereby both the Russians and Chinese IPRs were controlled from London. Their British Council big brothers sent directives for Russia and China Council minions.

In this way, the Britain masked their control of both Russia IPR and China IPR.

In other words, WWII was British kabuki theater to create a dual Russian-Chinese post-war communist threat in order to fuel a fake albeit lucrative Cold War against enemies of one’s own making.


This is more than just controlled opposition; this is fake opposition designed to drive America into anti-communist post war spending in Congress while the State Department helped Britain consolidate its control of America’s institutions following the Mar. 05, 1946 “Ultra Top Secret” “Five Eyes” mass surveillance agreement. (See above.)

Why the trickery? America had banned surveillance of American citizens by our intelligence services, so the pro-Communist State Department relied on the “Five Eyes” British backdoor so they could use the information to steer public opinion and policy.

Since 1978, Project Echelon secretly permitted spying on Americans. Even the espionage series Alias named their super computer “the echelon system” to condition Americans before Edward Snowden formally exposed the illegal program.


We ask readers to consider the strong possibility that the infamous “Cambridge Five” (1930-63) homosexual British spies may have, in fact, been quadruple IPR agents for the British, Soviets, Chinese and State Department Communists to coordinate IPR communications through Moscow IPR.
Donald Maclean (likely Pilgrims Society member through father Sir Donald Maclean), Guy BurgessKim Philby(Sir) Anthony Blunt and John Cairncross (MI6, GC&CS, Bletchley Park, ULTRA).

Note: We have discovered the very strong possibility that the Enigma machine never needed breaking because IBM had the German cipher from the beginning of WWII. Cairncross may have been responsible to keep that treacherous Pilgrims Society/IPR secret from becoming known until they had maximized their profits from the war.

The issue of Cambridge Five gayness is relevant in looking at the historical preponderance of homosexuals in the formation of the Pilgrims Society inner circle. There is an evident connection between British self-anointed elitist homosexuality and power mongering. The fact that a disproportionately large number of these people are Jewish is another fact to grapple with. By their own well-publicized admissions, their Jewish ness was ancestral and not out of religious conviction.

Most, if not all, of the Pilgrims were gay or bisexual (e.g. Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Milner, Lord Rosebery, Rothschild, W.T. Stead, Lord Pirbright, John Buchan). In addition, the role of sodomy and rape in subjugating British slaves by the slavers appears to have become a sexual addiction (mistaken for homosexuality) to the self-anointed British elites who passed the sin and decrepitude down through the family blood lines. In other words, they personified evil.

In short, we believe all the following conflicts were stage-managed by Britain, including the Boer Wars, WWI, Bolshevik “revolution,” Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Korea, Kosovo, Rwanda, Cambodia, Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Libya, 911, Sandy Hook, San Bernardino, COVID.

These were not random events, they were staged to move America toward reunion with Britain within a thoroughly communist British-created and -controlled United Nations.

This is what we are seeing in these new facts. We encourage super sleuths to dig for more confirmation of this new reality that Great Britain is not, and never has been, a friend to any nation.

Instead, the British elitists eminating from the Pilgrims Society and its Chatham House are profoundly sneaky attorneys, bankers, technocrats and globalists who slither around like reptiles to deceive and dominate their fellow man.

The solution is straightforward.

Pray for them, for they are lost souls in need of forgiveness and repentance.

Defund their slush money. Take away their ability to bribe. Fire Senior Executive Service bureaucrats and replace them with no-nonsense engineers who will follow our laws in holding them accountable. Re-make a judiciary and State Department that is not treasonously enslaved to Chatham House.

Also, pray for justice for their victims.